<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Merc Strategy Group, LLC &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mercstrategy.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mercstrategy.com</link>
	<description>Where Technology Meets Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:15:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google+: A Primer for Politicians and Political Organizations</title>
		<link>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2011/07/google-plus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2011/07/google-plus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Mercadante</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercstrategy.com/?p=1893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when you were finally starting to figure out Facebook and Twitter &#8230; along comes Google&#8217;s entry into the social media world with Google+. Google+ is still officially in &#8220;beta&#8221; right now, but they&#8217;ve started opening up the invite process. According to this Wall Street Journal report, the service has garnered 18 million users in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mercstrategy.com/merc/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/google-plus.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1898" title="google-plus" src="http://www.mercstrategy.com/merc/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/google-plus-300x296.png" alt="" width="300" height="296" /></a>Just when you were finally starting to figure out Facebook and Twitter &#8230; along comes Google&#8217;s entry into the social media world with <a href="https://plus.google.com/111176973545500950880/posts">Google+</a>.</p>
<p>Google+ is still officially in &#8220;beta&#8221; right now, but they&#8217;ve started opening up the invite process. According to this <em><a href="http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904233404576460394032418286.html?mod=WSJ_hp_mostpop_read">Wall Street Journal</a></em> report, the service has garnered 18 million users in its first three weeks.</p>
<p>I was fortunate enough to get an invite early on and be one of the first wave of users to join Google+.  It&#8217;s growth has been terrific.  When people ask me &#8220;what it is,&#8221; I tell them it&#8217;s a service that combines the best aspects of Twitter and Facebook to create a social media service that truly values conversation.</p>
<p>That being said — social media tools are what you make of them.  If you&#8217;re a politician or political organization that has been fortunate enough to snag an invite to Google+, please read on. While the service is still in its infancy, we try to provide some pointers on how to get started and make the most of Google+.  (And, for the record, the two most high profile politicians to join the service in its early days were <a href="https://plus.google.com/108373054660269328912/about">Newt Gingrich</a> and <a href="https://plus.google.com/104104126393959482852/about">Gary Johnson</a>.)</p>
<ul>
<li>First, set up a personal profile and fill out as much detail as possible. Unlike Twitter, catchy acronyms or nicknames aren&#8217;t appreciated.  Use your (or your candidate&#8217;s) real name.  The profile is key, as it allows people to find you via keyword search. As you can see from <a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=curt+mercadante&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8">this recent Google search of my name</a>, your profile is the first thing people will see from now on when they do a general Google search of your name.  Search engine gold!</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>You&#8217;re probably wondering: &#8220;Can I set up a page for my campaign organization, such as &#8216;Republicans for Fair Elections&#8217; or &#8220;Citizens for Smith&#8217;?&#8221;  The answer is no — not yet.  Google is set to role out pages for campaigns/organizations/businesses later this year. Some organizations have jumped the gun and set up profiles already — and there are some <a href="http://ibnlive.in.com/news/google-deletes-business-profiles-from-google/169306-11.html">early indications</a> that Google may &#8220;clean out&#8221; these pages (i.e., eliminate them).  They really want to create a clear delineation between individuals and organizations, which is smart.  They want to do it right.  So, for now, hold off on creating an organizational page.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Once your profile is set up, use the Search box to search for people who reside in your district.  Look at their profiles to find their interests.  Then start putting them into &#8220;circles.&#8221;  What are circles?  Basically, it&#8217;s a tool that allows you to segment the people you follow into groups, and then, if you wish, deliver customized messages to each circle.  For example, you may want to create circles for people based on the cities in which they reside. This would allow you to deliver messages only pertaining to those cities to the people in those respective circles.  Of course, you can always make your posts &#8220;public&#8221; so everyone can see them.  But the circles can be a useful tool.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Start posting.  Not just news releases, but actual conversational content designed to engage fellow Google Plussers. As with other social networking sites, Google+ allows you to humanize your content and provide a personal connection that no other media have ever allowed us to provide.  Just like we tell our clients regarding Twitter and Facebook: 30-second ads can provide a snapshot, but not nearly as effectively as a humorous tweet from the road, or a Facebook picture of you visiting the World’s Largest Ball of Wax en route to an actual campaign event.  Like those sites, Google Plus allows your campaign to provide a real-time scrapbook — showing constant activity.  You can show your supporters and network how hard you’re working simply by posting from the road with anecdotes and pictures of where you’ve been.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>As social media guru Chris Brogan <a href="https://plus.google.com/118320665823821681206/posts/SaufVYb8whz">warns</a>: &#8220;don&#8217;t just post and run.&#8221;  In other words — the strength of Google+ (and any social network) isn&#8217;t just broadcasting your message, it&#8217;s reading the feedback and commenting back and forth.  Throw out questions to see what kind of feedback you get.  It could be anything — from asking whether or not your followers support higher taxes &#8230; to asking if any of them have any good summer reading suggestions.  Just get the conversation started.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The Google+ interface makes it a great photo sharing tool. But, please, don&#8217;t just share photos from campaign events.  Share photos of &#8220;Americana&#8221; as you travel your district, throw on some family photos &#8230; make it interesting.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Sharing is appreciated. People always appreciate having their content shared.  If you see something you like, share it. The social media karma gods will repay you.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Feel free to +1 the posts you like.  +1 is basically similar to a &#8220;like&#8221; on Facebook.  It shows you find a post interesting or simply like it.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>You can also +1 content on the Web.  Similar to how Facebook allows you to &#8220;like&#8221; content around the Web, whether it&#8217;s a story in your favorite newspaper, or a post on your favorite blog, +1 buttons are starting to pop up all over the Web.  In addition, if you do a Google search, you&#8217;ll also notice that you can +1 various search results.  Theoretically, this may help boost search rankings for piece of content — but these +1&#8242;s also are<a href="https://plus.google.com/111176973545500950880/plusones"> catalogued in people&#8217;s Google Profiles</a> and can help lead to more viral traffic to your site. Encourage your supporters to +1 your Web content in the Google search results.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Think of creative ways you can use &#8220;Google Hangouts.&#8221; In short, Google Hangouts is a group video chat tool.  You can have video &#8220;hangouts&#8221; of up to 10 people.  Yes, it&#8217;s limited, but it can be powerful.  Newt Gingrich got <a href="http://techpresident.com/short-post/newt-gingrich-google-hangout-howd-go">some buzz</a> for being the first politician to hold a Google Hangout.  Imagine holding hangouts with 10 volunteers or voters in each town in your district.  Or perhaps holding hangouts with your regional campaign directors.  Conference calls are so early 2011.  It&#8217;s time to start hanging out.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Remember that Google+ is going to keep evolving, so be ready to adapt.</li>
</ul>
<p>Most importantly — always be testing.  See what works.  Learn what doesn&#8217;t.  Measure the feedback you get on certain kinds of posts — and watch closely the analytics on your Web site (which posts drive most people to your site, keep them there longer, etc.)</p>
<p>As with any social networking effort, have fun, be conversational, and act like a human.  The days of one-way broadcast communication are coming to a close.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about engagement.  See you on Google+!</p>
<p>Please also check out these additional resources:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://mashable.com/2011/07/16/google-plus-guide/">Google+: The Complete Guide</a> (Mashable)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/google-plus-tips-2011-7">10 Things You Never Knew Were Possible on Google+ </a> (Business Insider)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_plus_best_practices_trey_ratcliff_artist.php">Google Plus Best Practices: Trey Ratcliff, Artist</a> (ReadWriteWeb)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2011/07/google-plus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The death of email?  Call us skeptical</title>
		<link>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2010/06/the-death-of-email-call-us-skeptical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2010/06/the-death-of-email-call-us-skeptical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Mercadante</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curt Mercadante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merc Strategy Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Sandberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercstrategy.com/?p=1204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, this week Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg predicted the death of email: &#8220;Email is probably dying.&#8221; Forgive us if we&#8217;re skeptical. While nobody can fully predict what new technology will take hold over the next few years, email is still the fabric that holds together online communications. For example, Ms. Sandberg should look at her [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, this week Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-coo-email-is-probably-going-away-2010-6">predicted</a> the death of email:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Email is probably dying.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Forgive us if we&#8217;re skeptical.</p>
<p>While nobody can fully predict what new technology will take hold over the next few years, email is still the fabric that holds together online communications.</p>
<p>For example, Ms. Sandberg should look at her own company.  In fact, Facebook would be a whole lot different without email.  Where do friend requests, event invites and messages end up?  In both your regular email and Facebook inboxes.</p>
<p>Whether or not Facebook launches its own version of email — it&#8217;s still email.</p>
<p>Facebook also recently launched a new partnership with Yahoo! in which those with Yahoo! accounts can fully integrate the Facebook experience into their email.</p>
<p>Other newer social networking tools (and, yes, <a href="http://www.mercstrategy.com/2010/02/email-as-social-networking-tool-absolutely/">email is a social networking tool</a>) also heavily rely on email.  Twitter, for example, relies on email to deliver you direct messages and new follower alerts.</p>
<p>Further, take a look at this recent study that finds the great majority (58%) of Americans start their day with email — as opposed to 11% starting it with Facebook.  Those numbers could change in the coming years, but those current numbers don&#8217;t make it seem as if email is going anywhere anytime soon.</p>
<p>Will email change?  Yes.  Will it adapt?  Yes.</p>
<p>We already see how Gmail users&#8217; experience is changing — with the integration of Google Buzz, Google Voice and evolution of Google Chat.</p>
<p>Yahoo! is changing, as well, with its Facebook integration.</p>
<p>So, yes, email will change.  Email five years from now may look much different than it does today.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s dying.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s adapting.  And it&#8217;s a bit too early to predict its demise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2010/06/the-death-of-email-call-us-skeptical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP&#8217;s Google Ads: Smart or Shameful?</title>
		<link>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2010/06/bps-google-ads-smart-or-shameful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2010/06/bps-google-ads-smart-or-shameful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Mercadante</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curt Mercadante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merc Strategy Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercstrategy.com/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BP has purchased Google keywords ads for the term &#8220;oil spill&#8221; that links to a BP Web page with news updates on the cleanup effort.  Some folks are outraged.  But is this move smart &#8230; or shameful? In this post over on my personal blog, I provide my take — that it&#8217;s a good communications [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP has purchased Google keywords ads for the term &#8220;oil spill&#8221; that links to a BP Web page with news updates on the cleanup effort.  Some folks are outraged.  But is this move smart &#8230; or shameful?</p>
<p>In <a href="http://curtmercadante.com/on-bp-and-google-ads">this post over on my personal blog</a>, I provide my take — that it&#8217;s a good communications move.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2010/06/bps-google-ads-smart-or-shameful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Car buyers, billboards and Facebook ads</title>
		<link>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2009/11/car-buyers-billboards-and-facebook-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2009/11/car-buyers-billboards-and-facebook-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Mercadante</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car buyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curt Mercadante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merc Strategy Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercstrategy.com/?p=886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we lived in Northern Virginia earlier this decade, one thing we noticed is the lack of billboards along the highways. It was a pleasant discovery — but very noticeable to two people from the Chicago area, where billboards are plentiful (especially a growing number of brightly-lit electronic billboards with rotating ads.) So as I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we lived in Northern Virginia earlier this decade, one thing we noticed is the lack of billboards along the highways.  It was a pleasant discovery — but very noticeable to two people from the Chicago area, where billboards are plentiful (especially a growing number of brightly-lit electronic billboards with rotating ads.)</p>
<p>So as I drove to Midway Airport earlier this week, I started actually paying attention to the billboards.  And my thoughts immediate turned to Facebook ads.</p>
<p>Let me explain why &#8230;</p>
<p>From past experience, I know that billboards in the Chicago area can run anywhere from $5,000 to $15,000 per month, depending on location.  So, let&#8217;s use a nice round average of $10,000 per month.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re a car dealer paying this amount every month to have a billboard on I-55 going into Chicago (there are a lot of new car ads.)  That&#8217;s $10,000 a month to advertise to a large audience — most of whom are not in the market for a new car and may not be for a while, and many of whom do not reside/shop in the region or live out-of-state.</p>
<p>Bottom line — that&#8217;s a lot of money for a shotgun approach at advertising to a lot of people who may never purchase your product.</p>
<p>So &#8230; what if these car dealerships started spending their money on Facebook ads instead of billboards?</p>
<p>I decided to run the numbers.<span id="more-886"></span></p>
<p>First, a quick Google search turned up the following demographics of the average purchaser of a new SUV:</p>
<ul>
<li>Young married couples (30-35).</li>
<li>Medium family income $60,000</li>
<li>Over 50% female buyers</li>
</ul>
<p>So, I decided to enter those  demographics into the Facebook ad manager for the city of Joliet, IL (near where I live.)  The results should be of interest to any Joliet-area car dealer currently wasting $10,000 a month on highway billboards&#8230;.</p>
<p>For a mere $50 a day, using the car buyer demographics listed above, a Joliet car dealer could expect to reach a total Facebook audience of about 119,000 women right in their city — and receive 66 click-thrus a day from that audience. That&#8217;s just over 2,000 click-thrus a day from a targeted demographic of local consumers who are actually choosing to view your new car ads — for a total cost of about $1,500 per month.</p>
<p>Of those 2,040 people who click on the ads, how many will actually purchase a car?  Hard to say — but are car dealers currently tracking the return on their $10,000 a month investment?  Hardly.</p>
<p>To me, it seems like a no-brainer.  And it doesn&#8217;t just apply to Facebook ads.</p>
<p>I used the above example during my presentation yesterday to the U.S. Chamber Regional Government Affairs Conference in San Francisco.  I used the car dealer example — but then asked the audience if they could do the same to target Facebook users by political preference, demographics and keywords to take action on specific policy issues.</p>
<p>The uses are endless, really.</p>
<p>Is this post meant as a cheap ad for Facebook?  No — new online tools such as these are popping up all the time.  We&#8217;ve used keyword ads on Google and MSN in the past with good success.</p>
<p>My point is that online tools are changing the way people consumer their news, information and, yes, ads.  We now have the ability to target ads as never before.</p>
<p>And, in a tough economy, that can be hte difference between $10,000 a month for billboards — or $1,500 a month on ads that might actually work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercstrategy.com/2009/11/car-buyers-billboards-and-facebook-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

